Ever wonder if God could have used the big bang theory that scientists claim is viable? Ever wonder what the difference really would be between the Creation account of Genesis and man's phony baloney theory? Honestly their are many reasons why the big bang theory and the Genesis account can not exist in harmony, but below are a few plain-as-day examples to look over; clicking them aught to open larger versions.
As can be seen in the image above, the Bible says that Earth was created before the stars and that trees were created before the sun. However, the big bang view teaches the exact opposite. The Bible tells us that the earth was created as a paradise; the secular model teaches it was created as a molten blob. The big bang and the Bible certainly do not agree about the past in order of events. Whenever this kind of mismatch can be seen one or both must be incorrect. Since the Bible is God's word, a direct account of history, perfect and unchanging while the big bang is revised over and over again, without an end in sight, it is clear which is trustworthy.
Further, many people don’t realize that the big bang is a story not only about the past but also a prediction about the future, as can be seen above. The most popular version of the big bang teaches that the universe will expand forever and eventually run out of usable energy. According to the story, it will remain that way forever in a state that astronomers call “heat death.” But the Bible teaches that the world will be judged and remade in fire so a paradise can be restored. Their is a rather large difference at face value between the big bang and the Genesis account.*More can be found on the topic here, towards the bottom of the page labeled "What are some of the problems with the big bang hypothesis?"
No comments:
Post a Comment